No edit summary Tag: rte-wysiwyg |
No edit summary Tag: rte-source |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
What was the reason for this rule? I advocate that we rescind it and instead actively ''encourage'' creators of new characters to specify the exact Creative Commons license. This is a new era in ''PDSH'' history; we need better rules. —[[User:ElyaqimNYC|ElyaqimNYC]] ([[User talk:ElyaqimNYC|talk]]) 02:46, September 16, 2016 (UTC) |
What was the reason for this rule? I advocate that we rescind it and instead actively ''encourage'' creators of new characters to specify the exact Creative Commons license. This is a new era in ''PDSH'' history; we need better rules. —[[User:ElyaqimNYC|ElyaqimNYC]] ([[User talk:ElyaqimNYC|talk]]) 02:46, September 16, 2016 (UTC) |
||
:I sorta remember the reason(s) why (I also remember being adamantly for it - I think it was even my idea, to be honest) but, I'm gonna try to find it before sharing what I remember. Either way, I'm open to reconsidering based on how this thread develops. One thing I really don't want to see, though, is separate categories created for each license (but, I'll hold my reasons until when/if I can find the original conversation).[[User:Cebr1979|Cebr1979]] ([[User talk:Cebr1979|talk]]) 05:57, September 16, 2016 (UTC) |
:I sorta remember the reason(s) why (I also remember being adamantly for it - I think it was even my idea, to be honest) but, I'm gonna try to find it before sharing what I remember. Either way, I'm open to reconsidering based on how this thread develops. One thing I really don't want to see, though, is separate categories created for each license (but, I'll hold my reasons until when/if I can find the original conversation).[[User:Cebr1979|Cebr1979]] ([[User talk:Cebr1979|talk]]) 05:57, September 16, 2016 (UTC) |
||
| + | :[http://pdsh.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:JoeFrankenstein#Open_Source_Characters This] is not the conversation I'm thinking of but, it's the closest I can find right now. Will keep looking for the original, though.[[User:Cebr1979|Cebr1979]] ([[User talk:Cebr1979|talk]]) 06:30, September 16, 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:30, 16 September 2016
“Also, please do not post which Creative Commons Liscense a character is using by name or link to the public deed.”
What was the reason for this rule? I advocate that we rescind it and instead actively encourage creators of new characters to specify the exact Creative Commons license. This is a new era in PDSH history; we need better rules. —ElyaqimNYC (talk) 02:46, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
- I sorta remember the reason(s) why (I also remember being adamantly for it - I think it was even my idea, to be honest) but, I'm gonna try to find it before sharing what I remember. Either way, I'm open to reconsidering based on how this thread develops. One thing I really don't want to see, though, is separate categories created for each license (but, I'll hold my reasons until when/if I can find the original conversation).Cebr1979 (talk) 05:57, September 16, 2016 (UTC)
- This is not the conversation I'm thinking of but, it's the closest I can find right now. Will keep looking for the original, though.Cebr1979 (talk) 06:30, September 16, 2016 (UTC)